When I think about my criticism of other people, I'm disappointed to see how much of it could be more honestly laid bare as "be more like me." Or when I sit down to lay out a plan of action for someone, how conveniently the course aligns with my natural disposition. If I notice a flaw somewhere, I'm starting to think, and it happens to correspond with one of my own strengths maybe I ought to relinquish claims to judgment.
It's not pleasant to root out rationalization and subjectivity. You rob yourself of the right to indignation, an intoxicating position. Every time I dig around, I watch as the boxes I've trapped people in just disappear along with my superiority. The reality is that the smear of low level mediocrity never shines brighter than on a person unknowingly reacting to something inside them.
So the bold move when you encounter hypocrites may be ignoring the desire to dismiss them. The real question: would you really want to listen to someone whose moral philosophy was just as easily done as it was said?
P.S. Excellent essay Camila, you explained our economic crisis better than my current Econ professor can.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
oh man. I've never even thought about that.
"would you really want to listen to someone whose moral philosophy was just as easily done as it was said?"
well, no! I guess not!
Does effort make a difference, though? Perhaps it is easier to listen to somebody who is trying and failing to follow their own advice, than somebody who doesn't seem to try at all.
Post a Comment